How Did Women's Roles Change During The Industrial Revolution In America

Boott Mill Weave Room at Lowell NHP. (NPS) The industrial revolution that transformed western Europe and the United States during the class of the nineteenth century had its origins in the introduction of power-driven mechanism in the English and Scottish textile industries in the 2nd half of the eighteenth century. But far more than the cotton fiber textile manufacture was transformed in the grade of that revolution. Non-industrial wage labor increased; urban centers grew; and in farming areas, outwork occupations and commercial agriculture transformed the rural labor market place. Finally, these economic developments coincided with dramatic changes in family life, particularly declining family size and increasing life expectancy. A greater role for women in the labor force, gimmicky politics, and reform activities was certainly one of the unintended consequences of technological change in nineteenth-century America.

The industrial revolution in the United States was dependent from the kickoff on the transatlantic motion of British immigrants and British technology, including the adoption of the spinning jenny, h2o frame, and spinning mule that made the textile industry possible. The overflowing of British exports to the United States after the American Revolution stimulated efforts to replicate the inventions that gave English manufacturers such an advantage in the American marketplace. Out of these efforts emerged the get-go permanent cotton wool spinning mill in the United States, in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. English emigrant Samuel Slater—himself a quondam amateur at the English language material house of Arkwright & Strutt—reconstructed an Arkwright water frame under the sponsorship of Providence merchants William Almy and Moses Brown. The firm of Almy, Brown, & Slater pioneered in the machine production of cotton wool yarn betwixt 1790 and 1840. This company expanded, gave rise to a number of other firms, and established the basic set of business practices that came to be called the Rhode Island organization. These southern New England textile firms followed British practices, employing entire families, with children comprising the vast majority of the mill workforce. While the mills focused on carding and spinning, they relied on rural and urban paw weavers to finish the cloth. Thus the first cotton wool textile mills were very much a function of the region'due south rural landscape.

The success of these first factories spawned new competitors, even so, and the new factories contributed to a wave of urbanization in northern New England. The new wave of textile investment followed on the heels of a famous bit of industrial espionage by Boston merchant Francis Cabot Lowell. Lowell visited mills in Great United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and, on his return to Massachusetts, began efforts to reconstruct the ability loom he had seen there. Past 1814 he had succeeded and, armed with a charter of incorporation from the land legislature, he established the Boston Manufacturing Company in Waltham, Massachusetts.

Textile mills of the Waltham-Lowell organisation sprang up across the northern New England countryside between 1814 and 1850 and grew steadily across the second half of the century. Mills of the Rhode Island variety expanded as well, and the before regional differences faded over time. At mid-century, New England's material workforce had grown to number 85,000 producing textile goods valued at $68 million annually. Calculation in a substantial textile manufacture in the Philadelphia area, cotton fiber and woolen cloth mills were the nation's leading industrial employers at this appointment.

The adoption of the power loom permitted the vertical integration of all steps in the cloth manufacturing process nether a single roof. From opening the bales, to carding, spinning, dressing the warp yarn, and finally weaving the textile, all production steps were conducted within the manufactory. This alter led to a modify in the labor strength too. Both the ability loom and the dressing frame required adequately tall workers and children but wouldn't practice as they had for the mills in southern New England. Thus, the Waltham company depended from the commencement on a workforce of young, unmarried women recruited from the countryside. The business firm reached far into the countryside for this workforce and had to construct boardinghouses to arrange the rural women information technology recruited. Finally, to entice this new pool of labor, management offered monthly cash wages, a definite competitive advantage in comparison to practices in the family-style Rhode Isle mills.

Betwixt 1830 and 1860, women remained a primal labor force for this growing industry. Manufacturing plant superintendents paid recruiters to circulate through northern New England and to bring suitable immature women to work in their mills. The wages, typically set at $3.00 to $3.50 per calendar week, were much higher than annihilation farm daughters could earn in their hometowns and proved a strong attraction.

What motivated young women to leave their families in the countryside to work in the mills of New England's growing urban centers? Between analysis of the economic backgrounds of the families of factory women and what they had to say in their correspondence it is clear that mill employment permitted young women to earn their own support without depending on their families; 2d, the wages permitted young women to save something for their future marriages; finally, some daughters used their earnings to assistance their families.

On the whole, a mix of personal and familial motivations led daughters to leave their farming homes and take up factory employment. There was, in fact, a continuum stretching from those who went to the mills for entirely personal reasons and those who went to earn money to help support their families. Long-term economical considerations—especially how to save in apprehension of marriage—had more to do with the migration than the curt-term consideration of immediate self-back up. Women came from farming families that were able to maintain a minor standard of living. And then it was non poverty, per se, but the lack of future opportunities that pushed young women into the mills. And while young women were attending to their futures, and supporting themselves in manufactory towns, they accomplished a measure of economic and social independence not possible while living nether the parental roof.

Across the economic consequences of the growth of manufactory employment, significant cultural changes accompanied women's work in the early mills. Contemporaries repeatedly expressed concern that the mills were making young women unfit in a variety of ways for what was expected of them as nineteenth-century women. Some were concerned that mill employment made farmers' daughters less fit for marriage because they had become citified. They argued that the urban mill experience made young women dissatisfied with the country life of their parents. Thus i writer complained in 1858 that young working women no longer wanted a farm life. "They contemn," he wrote, "the calling of their father, and will, nine times out of ten, ally a mechanic in preference to a farmer." And this perception was based to a considerable degree on reality. Tracing a sample of manufactory women over their lifetimes reveals that but most a 3rd married men who were farmers or farm laborers and but a quarter of those who married lived the rest of their lives in their hometowns. Mill employment led many rural women to marry artisans or other urban workers and to drift from the farming homes of their youth to New England's growing cities. Immature people voted with their feet and their elders did not approve.

Manufactory employment likewise led some farmers' daughters to become engaged in the reform movements of the antebellum decades. At that place were labor protests in Lowell and other New England mill towns in the 1830s and 1840s, and the women who became involved in these struggles were active across a wide range of reform activeness.

The height of labor protest in the New England mills before the Civil War came with the emergence in the 1840s of a Ten 60 minutes Movement aiming for reduction in the hours of labor in the mills. The mills ran for seventy-three hours a week in this menstruation, averaging slightly more than twelve hours a day. Equally the pace of work in the mills increased without whatsoever wage gains, millworkers came to demand a 10-60 minutes workday, giving them time to relax, attend meetings and lectures, and participate in the urban cultural scene effectually them. These protests built on before strikes, known as "plough-outs" in the language of the time, reveal much about the sensibility that New England women brought to the mill experience. In October 1836, on the occasion of the second plough-out in Lowell, women founded the Lowell Manufacturing plant Girls Association to organize their protest. The preamble to the association's constitution reveals manufactory women'south sense of themselves as "daughters of freemen" and their connectedness to the young nation'due south republican tradition. The factory women, some ii,500 in number, left the mills to protest an increment in charges at visitor boardinghouses unaccompanied by a corresponding increase in their wages. The women held out for several months and displayed a swell sense of tactics in their struggle with the mill agents. In the end, the companies reduced boardinghouse charges for a good proportion of their workers, and the mill women returned to piece of work.

Ten years later, women organized the Lowell Female Labor Reform Clan with a view to restricting the hours of labor. The association survived for two and a half years and organized petition campaigns calling on the land legislature to prepare ten hours as the legal limit for the working twenty-four hour period. Republicanism from the revolutionary tradition and perfectionism from evangelical Protestantism were two major threads that both working men and working women drew upon to protestation the new impositions of industrial commercialism in nineteenth-century America.

These traditions also led mill women to become involved in a variety of other reform movements. Anti-slavery was stiff in Lowell and mill women sent several petitions to Washington opposing slavery in the District of Columbia and opposing war with Mexico, which might contribute to an expansion of slavery into the Southwest. Woman reformers came to run across opposition to black slavery and wage slavery as related causes. Some as well participated in the women's rights conventions that mushroomed after the get-go one was held in Seneca Falls, New York, in July 1848. Mary Emerson, a leader in Lowell's 10-hour movement, attended a women's rights convention in Worcester, Massachusetts, in October 1851. She shared the broad reform perspective that launched woman mill workers into labor protest in these two decades and contributed to the widening perspectives of American women in politics and social reform in the mid-nineteenth century.

The experiences of mill women demonstrate that mill employment not only brought women's work out of the home merely also provided women a collective feel that supported their participation in the earth of broader social reform. Lowell women became involved in anti-slavery, moral reform, peace, labor reform, prison reform, and women's rights campaigns. Furthermore, working women, like working men in this period, drew initially on republican traditions to defend their rights and interests but ultimately came to justify their concern for social justice on a combination of religious and rationalist grounds. They came to oppose the growing inequality evident in American society and to demand for themselves as workers and as women greater rights and rewards in that society.

Thomas Dublin is State University of New York Distinguished Professor of History at Binghamton University, SUNY and co-director of the Center for the Historical Written report of Women and Gender. His books include Transforming Women'due south Work: New England Lives in the Industrial Revolution (1994), Farm to Manufactory: Women'south Messages, 1830–1860 (1981), and Women at Piece of work: The Transformation of Work and Community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826–1860 (1979).